home
login
contact
about
Finance Dublin
Finance Jobs
 
Friday, 19th April 2024
    Home             Archive             Publications             Our Services             Finance Jobs             Events             Surveys & Awards             
CESR identifies four milestones in transition to IFRS Back  
The Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) has published its recommendation for regulators on how listed companies can effectively manage the communication of the financial impact of transitioning to international accounting standards in 2005.
CCESR considers it essential that the transition must be carefully monitored by regulators to ensure that every company continues to meet its reporting requirements and that investors are able to understand the effect of the new reporting standards on the financial position of listed companies.

European companies whose securities are traded on a regulated market will be required by the European Regulation n∞1606/2002 of July 2002 to use International Financial Reporting Standards (IAS/IFRS) to prepare their 2005 consolidated financial statements. CESR final advice to its members (Europe’s securities regulators) following consultation during October and November 2003, attempts to blend the needs of listed companies and investors by proposing that listed companies implement a phased transition process.

This will facilitate listed companies in their assessment of the financial consequences and enable appropriate planning for the application of the international accounting standards whilst also ensuring investors are provided with financial information which is easy to interpret.

CESR has identified four milestones in the transition process, as follows:

1) The publication of the 2003 annual report (including the 2003 financial statements. At this stage, it is recommended that companies explain how they intend to carry out the transition to IAS/IFRS (plans and degree of achievement for the transition). Listed companies are also encouraged to explain in a narrative form the key differences between their present accounting policies and the ones they know with sufficient certainty they will have to apply under IAS/IFRS.

2) The publication of the 2004 annual report (including the 2004 financial statements). CESR recommends that, as soon as a company can quantify the impact of the change to IAS/IFRS on its 2004 financial statements in a sufficiently reliable manner, it is encouraged to disclose the relevant quantified information. Such disclosure should be made in a way that is not misleading (i.e. covering all possible impacts, positive and negative). If the company is not in a position to provide this quantitative information, it is recommended to at least complete and update the narrative information referred to above (under a.).

3) The 2005 interim financial reports (half-yearly and quarterly financial reports). The aim of the recommendation is not to mandate the publication of interim reports, as this aspect is governed by applicable national and European regulations. Interim reports can also be made voluntarily.

• Where interim financial reports are published in 2005, it is recommended that listed companies start applying as from 1st January 2005 either IAS 34 ‘Interim Financial Reporting’ or, if this is not possible, at least the IAS/IFRS recognition and measurement principles that will be applicable at year end. It is worth noting that many respondents to the consultation strongly supported the proposal that issuers start using IAS/IFRS recognition and measurement principles for interim financial reports in 2005.

• Concerning the comparative information for the corresponding previous period, CESR recommends that companies provide these and that they are prepared according to IAS/IFRS, using the same accounting rules as those used in 2005.

4) The 2005 annual financial statements. In most cases, the 2005 annual financial statements will be the first complete set of financial statements to be presented under IAS/IFRS by listed companies in Europe. In this regard, CESR proposes not to go beyond the existing requirement that only one year of comparatives (e.g. 2004) be prepared and presented under IAS/IFRS.
Addressing the various situations where companies are required or choose to present three successive periods, but have not restated under IAS/IFRS the earliest period presented (e.g. 2003), CESR proposes a format (‘the bridge approach’) for the presentation of the comparative figures (2004 and 2003 in the example), to enable as much comparability as possible, even though they would not have all been prepared under IAS/IFRS.

Digg.com Del.icio.us Stumbleupon.com Reddit.com Yahoo.com

Home | About Us | Privacy Statement | Contact
©2024 Fintel Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.